Carbon dating fallacy

Now, however, a team led by Christopher Bronk Ramsey of the University of Oxford has examined sediments in a Japanese lake and extended carbon dating to approximately 50,000 years.

The lake was chosen because the bed of the lake is anoxic and its sediments are thought to have been stable and untouched by ice-age glaciers.

Dover Area School District • Lists of creationist scientists • Melvin Mulder • Michael Behe • Michael Egnor • Model academic freedom statute on evolution • Non-materialist neuroscience • Of Pandas and People • Phillip Johnson • Project Steve • Richard Weikart • Science and Human Origins • Stephen C.

Meyer • Teach the controversy • Texas Board of Education • Text of The Wedge Strategy • Text of the Santorum Amendment • Wedge Strategy • Wedgie strategy • What is intelligent design?

• 12 Arguments Evolutionists Should Avoid • Affirmations and Denials Essential to a Consistent Christian (Biblical) Worldview • Andrew Snelling • Answers Research Journal • Answers in Genesis • Answers in Genesis-Creation Ministries International's Statement of Faith • Answers in Genesis Dawkins interview controversy • Ark Encounter • Atheists Outline Their Global Religious Agenda • Bodie Hodge • Creation Ministries International • Creation Museum • Hanzi of Genesis • Jason Lisle • Ken Ham • Lists of creationist scientists • Answers Research Journal • Answers Research Journal volume 1 • Answers Research Journal volume 2 • Answers Research Journal volume 3 • Answers Research Journal volume 4 • Answers Research Journal volume 5 • Answers Research Journal volume 6 • Answers Research Journal volume 7 • Answers Research Journal volume 8 • Alpha-Omega Institute • Andrew Snelling • Brian Thomas • Danny Faulkner • David A. Morris • Institute for Creation Research • Jason Lisle • Jeffrey Tomkins • Jerry Bergman • John D.

Until now, we have had no detailed record of the C concentration beyond the age of the oldest trees.

These include the starting conditions, the constancy of the rate of decay, and that no material has left or entered the sample.

Furthermore, if a sample has been contaminated, scientists will know about it.

The new calibration will be significant to archeology and studies of climate change. Not an earthshaking discovery, to be sure, but it shows how science progresses, step-by-step, while creationism merely stagnates. Thanks to Rolf Manne of the University of Bergen, Norway, for alerting me to the importance of Bronk Ramsey’s article.

Carbon dating has a certain margin of error, usually depending on the age and material of the sample used.

Leave a Reply